Jesse Oak Taylor – 91̽News /news Mon, 16 Oct 2023 21:02:29 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 “Ways of Knowing” Episode 1: Reading /news/2023/10/10/ways-of-knowing-episode-1-jesse-oak-taylor-reading/ Tue, 10 Oct 2023 16:07:07 +0000 /news/?p=82274 What marks the start of the – the geological epoch marked by human impact on the planet? The debate hinges, in part, on how we define “signature events,” the important information left behind as clues. But finding signature events transcends the study of the Anthropocene; it’s how we read to make meaning of a text, a collection of data, even a piece of art.

·

Ways of Knowing

Season 1: The Humanities

Episode 1: Reading

 

 

 

Sam Harnett: On the first day of his environmental humanities class at the 91̽, English Professor Jesse Oak Taylor has his students do a thought experiment. Imagine alien geologists come to Earth in 100 million years. What evidence would they find of human impact on the planet?

 

Jesse Oak Taylor: Everyone can look around and see that humans are a major force on humans today, will that still be legible in 100 million years? The alien stratigraphers arrive at Earth 100 million years from now arriving on Earth, and what would the traces look like? What traces might be preserved?

 

SH: Maybe it’s nuclear radiation, fossil fuels, trash residue, or a wave of extinctions.

 

JOT: There’s two key criteria that have to apply there. One is the trace has to be durable. The other thing is it that has to be globally synchronous, they’re looking for a trace that appears everywhere on Earth at once.

 

SH: Geologists have been doing a similar thought experiment. They’re trying to determine at what point humans changed the planet so much that it counts as a whole new geological age. An age they’re calling the Anthropocene.

 

[drilling sounds]

 

SH: Over the last decade, geologists have been drilling core samples, searching for traces that can pinpoint when the Anthropocene began. In 2023, they found an answer. It lay in the rock strata beneath a shallow lake in Ontario.

 

[water sounds]

 

 

SH: Crawford Lake is a rare meromictic body of water. That means its layers of water never mix. They’re stagnant. Any sediment deposited in the lake settles uniformly on the bottom, which makes the lakebed very good at preserving history. The lake was first formed some 10,000 years ago, and it’s been keeping record of changes on Earth ever since.

 

[underwater sounds]

 

SH: In the lake you can see records of early agriculture, logging and milling, the introduction of the combustion engine, and shifts in biodiversity. Geologists propose that the most fundamental change to the environment by humans happened in the mid-20th century, when globalization and nuclear activity began leaving a dramatic signature in the lake bed. For them, this is the start of the Anthropocene.

 

[music]

 

SH: The debate doesn’t end here, though. Really, it’s just the beginning.

 

The geological start date of the Anthropocene is just one fact. It needs to be fit into a larger narrative, and the narrative we settle on will determine how we understand and react to the way humans have changed the planet. This can’t be done by just running the right tests or gathering more data. It’s a monumental interpretive challenge. The kind of challenge that the analytical methods in the humanities are very well suited for.

 

JOT: How do you tell a story, how do you identify what are meaningful traces, how do you interpret something and ascribe meaning to it, how do you identify where the inflection points in history are? Once you start leaning on these questions of how do you identify a trace, and correlate it to the causes, then you really are deep into the weeds in some level in the kinds of discussions that happen in literary studies in literary theory.

 

SH: Scientists do this kind of interpretive work every day. Natural disasters are a prime example. Whenever there is a large wildfire or aggressive hurricane, a major goal for environmental scientists is to try and determine how much of it is related to human activity. They use the term “signature” to describe when human involvement is measurable. That term caught Jesse’s attention.

 

JOT: They’re trying to correlate a signature to an event and put it in context, that takes us right back to this Jacques Derrida essay that we all read in graduate school called “Signature Event Context” that’s about how do you identify the trace, and what counts as a signature.

 

[music]

 

SH: Jacques Derrida was a French philosopher and literary theorist credited with deconstruction. In this essay, he’s presenting a new theory on one of the most basic acts in the humanities: reading. Derrida theorizes that a reader must first identify what in the text counts as a signature — a valid piece of evidence — put that signature in context, and then determine its possible meanings.

 

For instance, let’s say a stratigrapher notices a layer of sediment in London with industrial waste from the year 1790. The signature –– the tangible evidence –– is the industrial waste. The event could be pollution from a certain group of factories at the time. And the context would be the Industrial Revolution — everything from the kinds of factories to where they were located, and what they produced. If you didn’t know the context –– that the Industrial Revolution ever happened –– you might misread the significance of this industrial waste. You might think it was an isolated feature at an isolated time in London, not part of a larger story.

 

 

The more Jesse and his collaborator Tobias Menely looked at scientific papers on the Anthropocene, the more they encountered this kind of analysis — Derrida’s way of reading.

 

JOT: And it was kind of an exciting moment for us, at least for me, because I had had to read all this Derrida in graduate school, it was really confusing. People like to beat up on Derrida as evidence for the irrelevance of the humanities, and suddenly here we have this problem, coming out of the sciences, and here we were suddenly coming right back to Derrida.

 

SH: To try to understand the Anthropocene, scientists are reading the environment in the same way Derrida says to read a text. They’re searching for signatures, connecting them to particular events, and interpreting their meaning in a greater context.

 

 

[person reading a title of an academic paper]

 

“Signature of Ocean Warming in Global Fisheries Catch”

 

SH: These are titles of recently published research papers.

 

[person reading titles]

 

“Fingerprint of Climate Change in Precipitation Aggressiveness Across the Central Mediterranean Area”

 

“A Multi-Millennial Climatic Context for the Megafaunal Extinctions in Madagascar”

 

“Ocean Color Signature of Climate Change”

 

“Human Fingerprint on Structural Density of Forests Globally”

 

SH: Derrida’s way of reading is not just important in the Anthropocene debate. It’s essential throughout the sciences.

[person reads titles]

 

“The Phosphoinositide Signature Guides the Final Step of Plant Cytokinesis”

“The Chlorine Isotope Fingerprint of the Lunar Magma Ocean”

 

“Filaments of Galaxies as a Clue to the Origin of Ultrahigh-Energy Cosmic Rays”

“Synovial Signatures Signpost Arthritis”

“Universal interferometric signatures of a black hole’s photon ring”

 

“A Globally Coherent Fingerprint of Climate Change Impacts Across Natural Systems”

 

SH: Fingerprints, signatures, context, clues…This is what scientists reason into a coherent story.

 

This is the story of how one species changed a planet…

 

SH: This is a three-minute video that was shown at a United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. Jesse shows it to his students every year.

 

 

New artificial fertilizers meant we could feed more people. Population rose rapidly. But this was nothing compared with what was to come…

 

JOT: I often show this video on the very first day of my introduction to environmental humanities class.

 

SH: It presents the Anthropocene as a clear narrative that begins with the Industrial Revolution and marches forward toward modern-day climate change. As if that’s the objective, universally agreed-upon story.

 

 

 

Temperatures are increasing…We have made a hole in the ozone layer…

 

 

SH: But that’s not true. There are lots of ways to tell this story. Instead of the Industrial Revolution, you could decide to construct a narrative that goes back 12,000 years to the advent of agriculture. Or you could start with modern globalization. How you tell this story depends on what you think the causes and potential solutions are to the way humans are changing the planet.

 

JOT: People have proposed renaming it the Capitalocene, like it’s not humans, it’s capitalism; the Plantationocene, that would connect to the questions of empire and slavery; there’s the Technocene, the Wasteocene.

 

 

 

Welcome to the Anthropocene.

 

SH: Whatever you decide to call it, the same kinds of questions need to be addressed: What counts as evidence, how does it fit into a bigger picture, and then how do you communicate that to others?At its root, we’re talking about something humans have been doing for a really long time: reading. We’ve been reading texts for over 3,000 years, pictures and symbols for millennia before that, and the clues in our environment for the whole history of our existence.

 

JOT: It’s the hallmarks of you know, introduction to humanities as academic discipline. It’s also like the hallmark of humanity. If you think about…Imagine a prehistoric hunter tracking game, and saying OK, I have to understand this track in the mud and connect it to a story that helps me understand where that creature is going…Those types of interpreting traces, you know we do it, other animals do it, right? They’re doing it all the time. They’re trying to kind of interpret signs of danger, signs of food, you know sexual attraction, like all these things. Interpreting the world is a kind of basic condition of conscious life, that then plays out in this very particular way in what we do in the humanities.

 

SH: Whether you’re analyzing literature, a painting, a movie, or data from an experiment, you’re doing the same thing. You’re reading. Reading is not just about decoding and interpreting lines of text, but the greater process we discussed in this episode: identifying what counts as a trace or signature, learning how to gather meaning from that signature, and then organizing it into a coherent narrative. Reading is the primary way of knowing in the humanities, and is important in the sciences as well. One could argue reading is the main way we make sense of things in our everyday lives as well. Each way of knowing that we introduce in this audio series is built on this foundational analytical tool. Over the course of the series, we will learn how to read different materials, from poetry and comic books to music, photographs, monuments, and landscapes; and how these forms of reading, or ways of knowing, can enrich our understanding of the world.

 

 

At the end of each episode, we’re going to provide you with some resources –– a little bibliography –– in case you want to know more about the topic of the episode. So, here are five texts about reading and the Anthropocene.

 

“” by Alberto Manguel

 

This book is exactly what the title suggests: a history of humankind’s relationship to reading, from the first extant texts to reading on digital devices.

 

“” by Jeremy Davies

 

This is a great introduction to the concept of the Anthropocene, the history of how humans have changed the planet, and current debates over what’s causing that change.

 

“” By Jan Zalasiewicz

 

This book is the source of that thought experiment about alien geologists trying to reconstruct the story of how humans shaped the planet. It’s a great example of the process of trying to identify what counts as a valuable signature or trace that can be read to build a larger narrative.

 

“” edited by Tobias Menely and Jesse Oak Taylor

 

This collection of essays fleshes out Jesse’s insight: that literature and the analytical methods in the humanities are essential to understanding and addressing the way humans have altered the planet.

 

“Signature Event Context” by Jacques Derrida

 

It’s not an easy read by any means, but here it is if you want to get your hands on the source material for Derrida’s analytical method. You could also read Simon Glendinning’s “Derrida: A Very Short Introductionor watch the 2002 film “Derrida.”

 

SH: Just for kicks, here’s a very short passage:

 

[person reading]

 

Now, the word ‘communication’ which nothing initially authorizes us to overlook as a word and to impoverish as a polysemic word, opens a semantic field which precisely is not limited to semantics, semiotics and even less to linguistics…

 

 

SH: Not for the faint of heart.

 

 

Chris Hoff: Ways of Knowing is a production of The World According to Sound. This season is about the different interpretative and analytical methods in the humanities. It was made in collaboration with the 91̽ and its College of Arts & Sciences. All the interviews with 91̽faculty were conducted on campus in Seattle. Music provided by Ketsa, Chad Crouch, John Bartmann, and our friends, Matmos.

 

SH: The World According to Sound is made by Chris Hoff and Sam Harnett.

 

[end]

 

 

Jesse Oak Taylor, associate professor of English
Jesse Oak Taylor, associate professor of English

, associate professor of English at the 91̽, uses a video about the Anthropocene to explain signature events to students, and how reading – finding those clues – is a fundamental analytical tool of both the sciences and the humanities, helping us to better understand our world.

This is the first of eight episodes of “Ways of Knowing,” a podcast highlighting how studies of the humanities can reflect everyday life. Through a partnership between The World According to Sound and the 91̽, each episode features a faculty member from the 91̽College of Arts & Sciences, the work that inspires them, and suggested resources for learning more about the topic.

Next | Episode 2: Close Reading

]]>
English Department discusses coronavirus, ‘politics of care’ in ‘Literature, Language, Culture’ podcasts, videos — plus Devin Naar of Sephardic Studies interviewed on two podcasts /news/2020/09/09/english-department-discusses-coronavirus-politics-of-care-in-literature-language-culture-podcasts-videos-plus-devin-naar-of-sephardic-studies-interviewed-on-two-podcasts/ Wed, 09 Sep 2020 19:28:31 +0000 /news/?p=70241
Jesse Oak Taylor

The Department of English has introduced its new , a series of podcasts and YouTube videos in which 91̽humanities faculty discuss their research and teaching — “including the ways our work contributes to how we experience and seek to understand this time of global crisis.” Each presentation is available in both podcast and YouTube video formats.

Michelle Liu appeared on an Engiish Department podcast
Michelle Liu

In the first of so far, associate professor describes “what studying literature in what’s called ‘the environmental humanities’ teaches us about collectivity during events from Cyclone Amphan to COVID-19.” was a powerful tropical cyclone that caused damage in Eastern India in May.

The second episode features , senior lecturer and associate director of writing programs, on the topic, “What Asian American Studies, Literature and Art Teach Us During COVID-19.” Liu also discusses anti-racist pedagogical practices.

Stephanie Clare appeared on an English dept podcast
Stephanie Clare

The third episode features associate professor on “Queer Care and Trans Literature During COVID-19.”With a focus on promoting a “politics of care,” key texts she covers in the talk include “” by Imogen Binnie to “,” by Kai Cheng Thom.

Public scholarship project director for the podcast/video series is lecturer and project manager is Jake Huebsch, coordinator of the department’s Expository Writing Program.

In other podcast news:

Sephardic Studies chair Devin Naar visits two podcasts

 91̽professor Devin Naar was a guest on two podcasts
Devin Naar

, 91̽professor of history and Jewish studies and chair of the Jackson School’s Sephardic Studies Program, was a guest on two podcasts in recently.

In May Naar discussed the history and cultural legacy of the Ladino language on a about Near Eastern history, language and culture produced by Foreigncy.US. He described the growing , in the Jackson School’s , gathering and digitizing documents pertaining to the Sephardic Jews of the Mediterranean world.

Naar also was a guest in September on a podcast called “Then and Now,” produced by the University of California, Los Angles, Center for History and Policy. The episode was titled “.” Naar discussed the topic from the perspective of Sephardic Jewish history.

“He challenges the imposed racial categorization of Jews in the United States, discusses the erasure and exclusion of Sephardic and Mizrahi identity in mainstream Jewish institutions,” program notes say, “and proposes a historical reclamation of Sephardic identity and a radical reimagining of community spaces.” This podcast was released on Sept. 8.

]]>
UW-authored books and more for the Dawg on your holiday shopping list /news/2017/12/19/uw-authored-books-and-more-for-the-dawg-on-your-holiday-shopping-list/ Tue, 19 Dec 2017 20:27:00 +0000 /news/?p=55925
“American Sabor: American Sabor Latinos and Latinas in US Popular Music” by Marisol Berríos-Miranda, Shannon Dudley and Michelle Habell-Pallán, was published in December. The authors also created an American Sabor playlist. Photo: 91̽Press

A novelist’s thoughts on storytelling, a geologist’s soil restoration strategy, an environmentalist’s memoir, a celebration of Latino music influences, a poet’s meditations on her changing city …

Yes, and a best-selling author’s latest work, a podcast reborn as a book, a collaboration of world-class violists and even tales of brave Icelandic seawomen — at this festive time of year, 91̽ faculty creations can make great gifts for the Dawg on your shopping list.

Here’s a quick look at some gift-worthy books and music created by 91̽talents in the last year or so — and a reminder of some perennial favorites.

Charles Johnson, “
.” Johnson, National Book Award-winning author of “” and longtime professor of English, discusses his art in a book stemming from a year of interviews. “There is winning sanity here,” the New York Times wrote: “Johnson wants his students to be ‘raconteurs always ready to tell an engaging tale,’ not self-preoccupied neurotics.” Published by .

Marisol Berríos-Miranda, Shannon Dudley and Michelle Habell-Pallán, An extraordinary exhibit at the Smithsonian and Seattle’s Experience Music Project (now Museum of Pop Culture) comes to life as a book, detailing Latino influence on American popular music from salsa to punk, Chicano rock to the Miami sound. Berrios-Miranda is an affiliate associate professor of ethnomusicology, Dudley an associate professor of music and Habell-Pallán an associate professor in the Department of Gender, Women and Sexuality Studies. It’s a dual-language volume — English on the right side, Spanish on the left. And as a bonus the authors have created an American Sabor on iTunes and Spotify; the book flags specific songs with a playlist icon. Published by 91̽ Press.

"Growing a Revolution: Bringing Our Soil Back to Life" by David R. Montgomery was published in 2017 by W.W. Norton & Co. Inc.
“Growing a Revolution: Bringing Our Soil Back to Life” by David R. Montgomery was published in 2017 by W.W. Norton & Co. Inc.

David R. Montgomery, “.” Montgomery, a professor of Earth and space sciences, won praise for his popular 2007 book “.” Several books later he returned in 2017 with this view of environmental restoration based on three ideas – “ditch the plow, cover up, grow diversity.” said Montgomery’s well-expressed views “will convince readers that soil health should not remain an under-the-radar issue and that we all benefit from embracing a new philosophy of farming.” Published by .

Margaret Willson, Willson is an affiliate associate professor of anthropology and the Canadian Studies Arctic Program. In her years working as a deckhand she came across historic accounts of a woman sea captain known for reading the weather, hauling in large catches and never losing a crew member in 60 years of fishing. “And yet people in Iceland told me there had been few seawomen in their past, and few in their present,” she said. “I found this strange in a country of such purported gender equality. This curiosity led to the research and all that came from it.” Published by .

Estella Leopold, “Stories from the Leopold Shack: Sand County Revisited,” by Estella Leopold, daughter of conservationist Aldo Leopold, was published by Oxford University Press.

Estella Leopold, “.” Leopold is professor emeritus of biology and the youngest daughter of , who wrote the 1949 classic of early environmentalism, “.” She returns to scenes of her Wisconsin childhood in this follow-up, describing her life on the land where her father practiced his revolutionary conservation philosophy. Published by .

David Shields, “.” Shields is a professor of English and the best-selling author of many books, starting with his 1984 novel “.” In 2017 he brought out this collection of essays that the New York Times called “a triumphantly humane book” and him “our elusive, humorous ironist, something like a 21st century Socrates.” The paper’s praise continued: “He is a master stylist — and has been for a long time, on the evidence of these pieces from throughout his career. . . All good writers make us feel less alone. But Shields makes us feel better.” Published by .

Joseph Janes, “.” The year 2017 saw Janes’ popular podcast “” become a book under a slightly different title. Janes is an associate professor in the Information School who writes here about the origin and often evolving meaning of historical documents, both famous and less known. Some of his favorite “documents” are Sen. Joseph McCarthy’s fictional list of communists, the Fannie Farmer Cookbook and the backstory to what’s called the Rosie the Riveter poster. Published by .

Frances McCue, Well-known Seattle poet, teacher and self-described “arts instigator,” McCue is a senior lecturer in English. She was a co-founder of Hugo House, a place for writers, and served as its director for 10 years. Those experiences fuel this book of poems about the changing nature of the city. “This is Seattle. A place to love whatever’s left,” she writes. Published by .

Scott L. Montgomery, “.” Scientific research that doesn’t get communicated effectively to the public may as well not have happened at all, says geoscientist Montgomery in this second volume of a popular 2001 book. A prolific writer, Montgomery is a lecturer in the Jackson School of International Studies. “Communicating is the doing of science,” he adds. “Publication and public speaking are how scientific work gains a presence, a shared reality in the world.” Published by .

Odai Johnson, “.” The true cultural tipping point in the run-up to the American Revolution, writes Johnson, a professor in the School of Drama, might not have been the Boston Tea Party or even the First Continental Congress. Rather, he suggests, it was Congress’ 1774 decision to close the British American theaters — a small act but “a hard shot across the bow of British culture.” Published by .

Here are some recordings from 2017 involving faculty in the 91̽School of Music:

Melia Watras, “.” Music professor Watras offers a collaboration from of world-class violists performing and sharing their own compositions with each other. Her own playing has been described in the press as “staggeringly virtuosic.” Richard Karpen, School of Music director, is among several guests. The title comes from the number of strings on the instruments used: two violas, one violin, and the 14-string viola d’amore. .

Cuong Vu 4-Tet, “.” A live collaboration between Vu, 91̽Jazz Studies chair, and renowned jazz guitarist Bill Frisell, who is an affiliate professor with the School of Music. Recorded in 2016 at Meany Theater, Vu and Frisell were joined by artists in residence Ted Poor on drums and Luke Bergman on bass. Released on .

In "Chopin: The Essence of an Iron Will," Craig Sheppard, longtime professor of music and a world-class pianist, plays sonatas and mazurkas by Frederic Chopin recorded live at Meany Theater in February 2017.
In “Chopin: The Essence of an Iron Will,” Craig Sheppard, longtime professor of music and a world-class pianist, plays sonatas and mazurkas by Frederic Chopin recorded live at Meany Theater in February 2017.

Craig Sheppard, “.” Sheppard, longtime professor of music and a world-class pianist, plays sonatas and mazurkas by Frederic Chopin recorded live at Meany Theater in February 2017. The Seattle Times said of an earlier Chopin concert of Sheppard’s that his playing featured “exquisite details … it was playing that revealed layer after layer of music in each piece, as if one were faceting a gemstone. Released on .


Here are some other notable recent UW-authored books:

  • Research on poverty and the American suburbs in “,” by Scott Allard, professor in the Evan School of Public Policy & Governance.
  • Literature meets science to contemplate the geologic epoch of humans in “,” co-edited by Jesse Oak Taylor, associate professor of English.
  • A popular science exploration of machine learning and the algorithms that help run our lives in “,” by Pedro Domingos, professor of computer science and engineering.
  • A close look at four of America’s electoral adventures in “” by Margaret O’Mara, professor of history.
  • A fully revised second edition of Earth and space sciences professor Darrel Cowan’s popular 1984 book, “.” This 378-page paperback is filled with details about Washington state geology.
  • The story of a city’s transition from the Ottoman Empire to Greece in “” by Devin Naar, professor of history and Jewish studies.
  • A city that “thinks like a planet” is one both resilient to and ready for the future that the changing Earth will bring, says Marina Alberti, professor in the College of Built Environments in “.
  • Todd London, professor and director of the School of Drama, follows the professional theater experiences of 15 actors from the 1995 class of Harvard’s American Repertory Theater in “.”
  • Dr. Stephen Helgerson, a 91̽School of Public Health alumnus and physician in preventive medicine for four decades, uses the novella form to tell of the influenza epidemic’s arrival in his state in “.”
  • On the 500th anniversary of the Protestant Reformation, an exploration of faith that results in the common good in “,” co-authored by Steve Pfaff, professor of sociology.
  • Calm down from holiday — and tech-induced stresses — by thinking mindfully with “” by communication professor David Levy.

Finally, still-popular and pertinent books from a few years back include the second edition of “” by Jeffrey Ochsner, professor of architecture; “” by Randlett with Frances McCue; “” by Cliff Mass, professor of atmospheric sciences; and the ever-popular “” by Bill Holm, professor emeritus of art history. All of these were published by , which has many other great titles.

]]>
A literary view of the human era: ‘Anthropocene Reading’ /news/2017/12/07/a-literary-view-of-the-human-era-anthropocene-reading/ Thu, 07 Dec 2017 22:10:44 +0000 /news/?p=55797 "Anthropocene Reading: Literary History in Geologic Times" was published in October by Penn State Press. It was co-edited by Jesse Oak Taylor,  91̽associate professor of English.
“Anthropocene Reading: Literary History in Geologic Times” was published in October by Penn State Press. It was co-edited by Jesse Oak Taylor, 91̽associate professor of English.

The epoch — the proposed name for this time of significant human effect on the planet and its systems — represents a new context in which to study literature. A new book of essays co-edited by a 91̽English faculty member argues that literary studies, in turn, also can help us better understand the Anthropocene.

“” is a book of essays co-edited by of the University of California, Davis, and , 91̽associate professor of English. It was published in October by Penn State Press. Taylor is director of undergraduate programs for the 91̽.

The book, Taylor said, grew from seminars he and Menely held at the American Comparative Literature Association conferences in 2015 and 2016. The essays were written specifically for the volume, he said, and contributors heard versions of the papers at the seminars, making the project “truly collaborative.”

Taylor said the questions he and Menely posed of contributors was essentially, “How should we read in the Anthropocene?” Other questions flowed from that, including:

  • “What kinds of interpretive strategies are necessary to situate literary works within a geological time scale?
  • How does the breakdown between “human” and “natural” history resulting from this geological era affect our understanding of literary history?

Dating the Anthropocene epoch poses a problem for critical reading, Taylor said, with “tensions between the protocols of Earth system science on the one hand and the stratigraphy on the other.” The era is, after all, “dependent on the inscription of human history within the geologic record.”

In the end, Taylor said, the volume argues that the Anthropocene is not just a new context in which to understand literary works, “but also that the methods of literary analysis and the vantage that literature opens on history are themselves integral to conceptualizing, dating, and ultimately confronting the Anthropocene itself.”

The Anthropocene, he added, “reorients our understanding of history and thus shifts the way we think about literary history as well,” such that “on some level, all literary works become potential records of human interaction with the planet, whether through energy systems, geological events or climatological restraints.”

Essays in the book come from academics at Yale University; the University of Chicago; the University of California, Berkeley; Columbia University; Georgetown University and the University of Melbourne, among others.

Taylor is also the author of the 2016 book “.” The book, he said, focuses on Victorian London as perhaps the first-ever example of “a thoroughly manufactured habitat, in which everything, including the weather, bore the legible imprint of human action — that is to say, precisely the challenge posed by the Anthropocene, albeit at smaller scale.”

Taylor also runs a on the Anthropocene at the 91̽Simpson Center for the Humanities, together with , 91̽assistant professor of Germanics.

###

For more information, contact Taylor at jot8@uw.edu.

]]>