The 91探花 is proud to announce that 56 faculty and researchers who completed their work while at 91探花have been named on the list from Clarivate.

The annual list identifies researchers who demonstrated significant influence in their chosen field or fields through the publication of multiple highly cited papers during the last decade. Their names are drawn from the publications that rank in the top 1% by citations for field and publication year in the .

Highly Cited Researchers demonstrate significant and broad influence in their fields of research. The total list includes 7,131 awards from more than 1,300 institutions in 60 countries and regions. This small fraction of the global researcher population contributes disproportionately to extending the frontiers of knowledge and contributing to innovations that make the world healthier, more sustainable and which drive societal impact, according to Clarivate.

The that determines the 鈥渨ho鈥檚 who鈥� of influential researchers is drawn from data and analysis performed by bibliometric experts and data scientists at the Institute for Scientific Information at Clarivate.

The list below includes faculty and researchers whose primary affiliation is with the UW, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation.

Please note: Some of the people on the list are no longer with the 91探花and their current affiliation is noted. This list reflects initial data from Clarivate and may be updated.

Ivan Anishchenko (Vilya)

David Baker

William A. Banks

Gregory N. Bratman

Steven L. Brunton

Guozhong Cao

Ting Cao

Lauren Carter (Gates Medical Research Institute)

Helen Chu

David H. Cobden

Katharine H. D. Crawford

Riza M. Daza

Frank DiMaio

Kristie L. Ebi

Evan E. Eichler

Emmanuela Gakidou

David Ginger

Raphael Gottardo (CHUV)

Alexander L. Greninger

Simon I. Hay

Andrew Hill (Infinimmune)

Eric Huang

Michael C. Jensen (BrainChild)

Neil P.聽 King

C. Dirk Keene

J. Nathan Kutz

Eric H. Larson

Aaron Lyon

Michael J. MacCoss

Brendan MacLean

C. M. Marcus

Julian D. Marshall

Ali Mokdad

Thomas J. Montine (Stanford)

Mohsen Naghavi

Marian L. Neuhouser

Julian D. Olden

Robert W. Palmatier

David Pigott

Hannah A. Pliner (Bristol Myers Squibb)

Ganesh Raghu

Stanley Riddell

Andrea Schietinger (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)

Jay Shendure

M. Alejandra Tortorici

Troy R. Torgerson (Allen Institute)

Cole Trapnell

Katherine R. Tuttle

David Veesler

Theo Vos

Alexandra C. Walls (BioNTech SE)

Bryan J. Weiner

Di Xiao

Jie Xiao

Xiaodong Xu

Jihui Yang

About 70% of people between the ages of 18 and 29 use Instagram, and it鈥檚 hard to spend much time scrolling without encountering a sponsored post from an influencer. The same holds true for just about any other social media platform.

New research from the 91探花 examines how factors related to influencers, their posts and their followers impact marketing success. Social media influencers are typically digital creators who have built a large following due to their knowledge on specific topics, such as beauty products, food or pets.

Recently published online and forthcoming in the Journal of Marketing, is one of the first to include cost data in its examinations of influencer marketing. Researchers found that if firms spent 1% more on influencer marketing, they would see a nearly 0.5% increase in engagement. They also concluded that reallocating spending based on the study鈥檚 insights could result in a 16.6% increase in engagement.

Engagement is the way people react to online content, such as such as liking, commenting or reposting. For this study, researchers prioritized the number of reposts because it represents a deep form of engagement where followers are choosing to share content with their own networks.

, co-author and professor of marketing in the 91探花Foster School of Business, said influencer marketing is currently producing higher return on investment, or ROI, than most other kinds of marketing.

鈥淚 predict that in the future, a lot of marketing is going to be crowdsourced,鈥� Palmatier said. 鈥淎s a marketing manager, you鈥檙e going to manage a portfolio of influencers, just like Nike manages a portfolio celebrities.鈥�

For this study, researchers tested data obtained from Weibo, a microblogging website that is one of the largest social media platforms in China. The data consisted of 5,835 posts written by 2,412 influencers related to 1,256 campaigns for 861 brands in October 2018. The brand sponsors spanned 29 categories, including beauty products, e-commerce platforms and food and beverages.

Researchers found that influencer originality, follower size and sponsor salience 鈥� the prominence of the brand in a post 鈥� enhance the effectiveness of a message, while posts that announce new products diminish it. Followers are less likely to repost product launches due to the heightened risk of vouching for something unknown to their networks.

The influencer鈥檚 activity rate, level of post positivity and follower brand-fit, or the degree to which the interests of an influencer鈥檚 followers match the sponsor, all produce inverted U-shaped effects. It hurts engagement if influencers post too much, for example, but engagement also suffers if they post too little. This suggests that a balanced approach is most effective.

鈥淚f you don鈥檛 post, I鈥檓 going to forget who you even are,鈥� Palmatier said. 鈥淏ut if you鈥檙e doing too much, it kind of cheapens you. It鈥檚 what we call an inverted-U shaped effect, which means there is an optimal point of activity where something performs the best.鈥�

When it comes to brand-fit, researchers found that firms should search for influencers with followers that overlap but aren鈥檛 an exact match.

鈥淚f you鈥檙e only talking to people who are most likely to buy your product, those people already know about it,鈥� Palmatier said. 鈥淣ow if you go to people who are a terrible brand match, they鈥檙e never going to buy it because it鈥檚 just a poor fit. You want people that have some interest, but probably don鈥檛 know about this product.鈥�

Palmatier used as an example of a brand that has successfully utilized influencer marketing. There was a time when the company had trouble acquiring younger customers, he said, because it was mostly popular with longtime consumers.

鈥淚f you think about Tiffany鈥檚 marketing department, it was probably a group of people that knew their historic targets,鈥� Palmatier said. 鈥淲hat they did was spend a very small part of their budget to bring in some influencers, and those influencers got multiple times higher returns than their own product managers.鈥�

Influencers compete in the free market to increase their followers and engagement, Palmatier said, which is a major factor in their success.

鈥淭hey had to be clever,鈥� he said. 鈥淭hey had to find a niche. In other words, influencers win their following by understanding their audience very well. When I go to an influencer with my product, they鈥檙e going to create posts that resonate with their followers. Tiffany never understood how to position its product for that group, but influencers were able to connect.鈥�

Another advantage of influencer marketing is microtargeting, Palmatier said. Customers can self-segment on social media by following specific topics that interest them. For example, a person might follow hashtags related to Paris before a vacation.

鈥淭his is crowdsource positioning,鈥� Palmatier said. 鈥淵ou give influencers a product and they go position it. People also see influencers as being more authentic because mentally, you feel like you鈥檙e actually 鈥榝riends鈥� with the people you follow on social media 鈥� even though you鈥檝e never met them 鈥� so they appear more authentic when they鈥檙e positioning the product.鈥�

Other co-authors were and of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University; 聽of Lingnan University; and of Colorado State University.

The research was supported by Lingnan University鈥檚 Direct Grant and Faculty Research Grant.

For more information, contact Palmatier at palmatrw@uw.edu.