January 23, 2024
Untangling abortion misinformation and its impacts on healthcare providers
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to an abortion with the . With federal protections gone, states became free to determine whether to restrict or protect abortion access, which has led to a number of new laws and regulations.
At the same time, misinformation surrounding abortion care and has influenced the way that healthcare providers, abortion advocates and abortion-seeking patients perceived this highly stigmatized process.
To explore the impact of this misinformation, Dr. , a research scientist at the 91探花 Center for an Informed Public, and her research team were awarded a Population Health Initiative Tier 1 Pilot Grant in spring 2023 to examine the influence abortion myths have on the work of abortion healthcare providers and other health professionals from related fields in the Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana and Idaho (WWAMI) region.
鈥淭his last year created a really fragmented environment, where some states were making big decisions to limit access to abortion care. These big moments in time create uncertainty for people, under which misleading information can really thrive,鈥� said Moran. 鈥淲e wanted to understand how this trickles down and impacts people in their attempts to give or get abortion-related care.鈥�
Other 91探花investigators include Dr. (Information School), Dr. (Gender, Women & Sexuality Studies), Taylor Agajanian (Center for an Informed Public), (Information School), Anna Beers (Human Centered Design & Engineering) and Dr. (Information School).
The research team鈥檚 initial step focused on building a research agenda, which provided background on the current state of knowledge in communication, information science and related fields about false information surrounding abortion. The information uncovered was then used to shape the secondary, and current, phase of the research 鈥� conducting a needs assessment.
A needs assessment is a methodical process that determines what is required to get from the current situation to a desired outcome. The research team is interviewing healthcare practitioners and reproductive rights advocates across the five-state WWAMI region, asking them to reflect on their recent experiences. 鈥淲e鈥檙e asking them, 鈥楬ow have your patient interactions been going, especially within the last year? What are you seeing out there? Are people getting good information? How has this impacted care?鈥欌�� said Moran.
These initial conversations have highlighted the influence of the internet. 鈥淲hat we have found is that people are going online to find information. Their first port of call is often Google. While this isn’t necessarily wrong, it does require a certain level of media literacy for people to assess whether that information is correct or accurate,鈥� explained Moran.
鈥淎bortion has always been a historically highly charged topic with people having a lot of very strong opinions. There鈥檚 a lot of stigma around getting an abortion, so there鈥檚 also not a good level of public knowledge,鈥� added Moran. This environment opens the door for misinformation to thrive, only increasing the difficulty in accessing accurate abortion information.
After completing their interviews, the researchers will analyze the transcripts to find patterns and common themes about abortion misinformation between responses. The information obtained from this analysis will then be used to develop future interventions that will bolster medical information literacy and disrupt false narratives about abortion care.
鈥淪ome of this information is new, some of it isn鈥檛. When you’re a researcher within a particular discipline, you tend to focus on a specific part of the problem. Legal scholars focus on the legal framework and medical practitioners focus on providing safe and effective medical care,鈥� said Moran. 鈥淏ut the bit we鈥檙e trying to provide is working across different disciplines to bring together all these different puzzle pieces about abortion myths and misinformation. That鈥檚 the new part.鈥�
Although the project is ongoing, Moran acknowledges how much the research team has gained from this opportunity. 鈥淭his has been a really great experience and has helped us to disentangle some of the good information from misinformation. Our team has already learned a lot,鈥� concluded Moran.