How will SFI disclosures be handled for projects which have “consultants” who are not 91̽��faculty members? Does the PI need to obtain a temporary 91̽��NetID for training and disclosures?

breona — Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:04:26 +0000

Most likely, consultants will not be considered investigators and will therefore not be affected. If consultants, who are not 91̽��employees, are investigators on a 91̽��project, they will likely be contracted through their academic institution, rather than personally. The subawardee, whether through purchasing or a subcontract, will be required to have a compliant policy in order to get federal funding. To meet the mandatory training requirement, an investigator who is not 91̽��personnel could take our training, via a .

The post How will SFI disclosures be handled for projects which have “consultants” who are not 91̽��faculty members? Does the PI need to obtain a temporary 91̽��NetID for training and disclosures? appeared first on FIDS.

Are investigators responsible for reporting the SFI of subcontractors?

breona — Fri, 10 Aug 2012 22:46:27 +0000

In general, no. Subrecipient institutions that meet the compliance requirements of the regulations will have their own reporting process; however, the subrecipient will need to provide the 91̽��with the appropriate assurances as part of the subaward agreement. In the rare case where the 91̽��might decide to manage a subrecipient’s SFI disclosures, the 91̽��would be responsible for reporting the subrecipient’s disclosures to the sponsor.

The post Are investigators responsible for reporting the SFI of subcontractors? appeared first on FIDS.

Subrecipients Archives - FIDS

How will SFI disclosures be handled for projects which have “consultants” who are not 91̽��faculty members? Does the PI need to obtain a temporary 91̽��NetID for training and disclosures?

Are investigators responsible for reporting the SFI of subcontractors?