Members of the 91̽»¨community are increasingly expressing themselves in blogs about their interests or professional matters. University Week will occasionally feature brief profiles of these blogs and their authors. This week we take a look at , a blog written by J. Patrick Dobel, professor of public affairs in the Evans School and adjunct professor of political science.
Q: How long have you been writing this blog, and how did it get its start?
I have been writing it for a year and a half. I started it as a way to think about some of the tensions in my responsibility as the Faculty Athletic Representative. I report to the President and oversee the academic and compliance integrity of the athletic program.
I reflected upon how many fans relate to athletics not just for appreciation of the sport and its excellences but as an extension of memory and identity. So I started thinking out loud about how sport, culture and ethics entwine for many of us. I began by thinking about my own relationship to athletics, which is mediated by memories of family and place.
Q: Who is your intended audience?
I wanted to write for an educated audience in a classic essay style. There are a lot of crazy blogs on sports, and I just wanted to write thoughtful, hopefully literate, commentary from a unique point of view. Sports writer Frank Deford is my role model.
Q: Have you had any interesting interactions with readers, through comments or e-mails?
I have enjoyed hearing from lots of different folks. I knew people cared but did not realize how much. The blog has migrated to some strange places and I will get feedback, emendations, corrections and sometimes just anger. Most of the comments come through e-mail, which is my own normal way of responding to blogs. The most interesting responses have come when I write about NCAA, Title Nine or sports and injuries.
I never write directly about 91̽»¨or the PAC10, given my official position and confidentiality issues.
Q: What are your best — or worst — experiences in having a blog?
I think the biggest surprise has been that people actually were interested in what I wrote. I wrote it pretty much for myself and really only expected my daughter to read it! I was thrilled when the blog got reprinted several times on another major site, and a small national news and opinion website regularly picks it up for its sports section.
I have enjoyed and learned from most of the comments; people make great fact checkers. Sometimes I will get e-mails from students who are using a post for a paper and want to follow up on an idea , and that is fun. I have been taken aback a number of times by how personal or mean some of the responses have been.
Q: Do you have any plans for where you’ll take the blog in the future?
I am not sure. I discovered as the blog got more visibility that it tempted me to change my approach to writing. I wrote as a reflective essay, and the visibility tended to demand more immediate and more aggressive stances. So I sometimes face a choice about finding my own voice or changing it to gain access to the larger audience.
Sometimes I consider expanding the range in terms of both creating a tweet and pursuing other outlets, but am not sure that approach is compatible with the reflective essay format. So I honestly don’t know.
Do you know of a blog written by a member of the 91̽»¨community that would be of interest to UWeek’s faculty and staff readers? Drop us a line at uweek@u.washington.edu.
