img:is([sizes=auto i],[sizes^="auto," i]){contain-intrinsic-size:3000px 1500px} /*# sourceURL=wp-img-auto-sizes-contain-inline-css */

91探花

Skip to content
Blog

Tag: future

Washington Roundtable Urges Legislators to Prioritize Higher Education

Posted on

A recent update on our state鈥檚 progress toward meeting the Washington Roundtable鈥檚听 emphasizes the need for legislative action on education, including protecting funding for our public universities, as well as transportation and business costs.听 The Roundtable 鈥� a nonprofit, public policy organization comprised of major, local business executives 鈥� created the Benchmarks in 2011 as a means to measure and track Washington鈥檚 economic vitality and quality of life. The organization publishes annual updates that examine state-by-state comparative data (primarily from federal sources like the U.S. Dept. of Education); assess Washington鈥檚 position in key categories; and highlight opportunities for improvement.

The showed that:

  • Washington trails most states in high school graduation rates (ranking 32nd nationally) and bachelor鈥檚 degrees awarded per capita (39th nationally).
  • Washington鈥檚 road condition rankings have dropped from 16th (2012 ranking based on 2008 data) to 29th (2013 ranking based on 2011 data) and our state continues to rank poorly on bridge conditions (41st).
  • Washington ranks in the bottom third of states for business tax burden (36th), unemployment insurance tax rates (40th) and workers鈥� compensation benefits paid (50th).
  • However, Washington has held onto its lead in patent generation (5th) and in low commercial and industrial electricity rates (3rd).

The authors argue that Washington must move quickly to improve its education pipeline and align with workforce needs. As 70 percent of Washington jobs will require postsecondary training by 2020, they assert, 鈥�It is imperative that Washington prioritizes higher education and does a better job of preparing its citizens to succeed.鈥�

In Monday鈥檚 edition of , Roundtable President, Steve Mullin, urged lawmakers to focus on two key topics during the remaining weeks of session:听 education and transportation. He specifically called for legislators to ensure our colleges and universities have the funding they need to develop necessary talent. 鈥淒ecision time is here,鈥� he wrote, 鈥�Education is the driver of prosperity and individual quality of life. Transportation is the backbone of commerce. Both need attention before the 2013 Legislature adjourns.鈥�

House Chair Released 2013-15 Operating Budget

Posted on

House Ways & Means Chair Ross Hunter released the today. Please see the for a complete analysis.听Table 1 shows the total funding the 91探花would receive under the House chair budget, divided into three standard categories: the carry forward level, the maintenance level and the performance level.

The House assumes that the 91探花will increase undergraduate resident tuition by 5 percent each year, thus making more revenue available. However, the House Chair budget requires that $2 million go toward the College of Engineering, $12 million be used to create a Clean Energy Institute, and a total of $16.5 million of the appropriation be used to support enrollments in Computer Science and Engineering.

As shown in the table below, once recognized additional operational needs are met and once dedicated funds are removed from the equation, the 91探花is left with almost $10 million less in net new state funding in 2013-15 compared to the previous biennium under the House budget. 听Once the potential additional tuition revenue is taken into account, however, the 91探花fares better under the House budget, even with its spending requirements.听 Moreover, the Senate relies on a draconian 20 percent surcharge on international student tuition to generate this additional funding amount.听 As mentioned in our , given that the majority of international students in Washington are enrolled at the UW, this amounts to a tax on 91探花students. It is expected that the surcharge will lead to a decline in international student enrollments, which could lead to an overall reduction of revenue for the UW.

We are still reviewing the potential impacts of this budget proposal and will provide revisions to the brief as more information becomes available. Once the House chair budget passes the floor (which is expected later this week), leaders of the House and Senate will begin negotiations to reconcile the differences between their respective approaches. It is likely that the 91探花will not have a clear sense of its actual anticipated state funding level until the end of this month at the earliest.

March Washington State Revenue Forecast Remains Relatively Stable

Posted on

On Wednesday, March 20, the Washington State Economic & Revenue Forecast Council (ERFC) released its quarterly update of State General Fund Revenues.听Revenue from an anticipated increase in Washington housing permits and real estate excise tax receipts is expected to offset higher federal tax rates and spending cuts than were previously assumed. Overall, revenue projections for both the 2011-13 and 2013-15 biennia remain relatively stable, with a slight net gain of about $40 million across the two biennia.听However, this net gain is negated by the roughly $300 million in additional Medicaid caseload costs. The state and its lawmakers now face a $1.3 billion deficit along with court-mandated funding for K-12 education, which could cost another $1 billion. Their upcoming budget proposals will have to reconcile these demands on the state purse.

We anticipate that the Senate Majority Caucus Coalition will release its operating budget proposal sometime next week, while the House will likely release its budget by early next month. Until that time, any specific impact on the 91探花cannot be assessed.听 Please see the full for more information.

 

Sequestration Goes Into Effect at Midnight

Posted on

Sequestration will take effect tonight at midnight. While the cuts will be smaller than originally mandated ($85 billion instead of $109 billion), the impact in federal FY13 will be higher since the cuts must now be applied to only seven months instead of nine. Immediate and long-term impacts on the 91探花and Washington State are difficult to predict. However, during the remaining months of federal FY13, we estimate that the sequester could reduce the UW鈥檚 federal grant and contract support by an estimated $75 million to $100 million and cut Build America Bonds (BABs) subsidy payments by $500K to $700K. Additionally, the 91探花is projected to lose about $33,000 in work study funds for 2013-14. The potential impact on Washington State includes $11.6 million less for primary and secondary education, $11.3 million less for education of children with disabilities, and 1,000 fewer children receiving Head Start services.

Please see听the prepared by the Offices of Federal Relations, Planning & Budgeting, and Research听and be sure to visit at the UW’s for regular updates.

University District Unveils Its Strategic Plan

Posted on

My name is Julia Martinelli and I am the Student Assistant for the Office of the University Architect within the Office of Planning and Budgeting. I am currently a Sophomore at the 91探花 and I am planning on majoring in Architecture with a minor in Urban Ecological Design and Italian. Within my position I will be writing about events, updates, and news regarding the planning and architecture.

Currently, the University District is preparing to undergo multiple changes in the upcoming years. In an effort to guide these changes, a group of residents, businesses, social service providers, the U District Chamber, City of Seattle, and 91探花 has come together to create The University District Livability Partnership. (UDLP) is a four-year strategic initiative that is working towards transforming the University District into a sustainable, walkable community. The vision of the UDLP for the University District is to have a vibrant and innovative district of entrepreneurs, major employers, talented workers, and diverse residents. The collaboration of partnerships in the UDLP are preparing to help the University District transition and grow as it experiences many changes in the upcoming years, especially with the emergence of the light rail station on NE 43rd St. and Brooklyn Ave.

Within the UDLP there are four components, which include the Commercial Revitalization Strategic Plan, an Urban Design Framework, U District Next: A Community Conversation and Long-Term Leadership & Partnerships, each of which focuses on different aspects and strategies to reach the final desired goal for the U District. Additional information regarding the different components of the UDLP may be found .

The UDLP Strategic Plan was formally released on January 31, 2013, at the third and final U District Next: A Community Conversation event. In order to preserve the unique and historical aspects of the University District as well as develop new enhancements that will enrich the already vibrant community, the Strategic Plan has developed five initiatives. The initiatives include organization, economics, marketing, clean & safe, and urban design, each of which has its own specific set of goals and strategies. The goal of the organization initiative is to create long-term leadership capacity and partnerships of effective and diverse voices. Whereas, the economic initiative is striving to create an attractive neighborhood for various startups, large companies, and businesses where they can both flourish and contribute to the community. The marketing initiative wants to both appeal to the current community of the U District as well as reach out and draw in new residents, investors and businesses by advertising the best elements of the neighborhood. The clean & safe initiative wants to develop a safe and clean environment that contains resources that will provide support to everyone. And lastly, the goal of the urban design initiative is to design and create a built environment that fits and reflects the culture of the University District community. All of these initiatives create a group of organized tasks that will contribute to The Strategic Plan鈥檚 strategic vision for the future University District. If you would like more information on the Strategic Plan, visit the UDLP .

Sequester Update

Posted on

Christy Gullion, Director of Federal Relations, recently provided an 鈥搕he large, automatic听federal spending cuts听originally scheduled听to take听effect January 1st of this year, but delayed until March 1st thanks to a last-minute, bipartisan deal.

For background information, please see our most recent post on the topic as well as the 听put out jointly by the 91探花offices of Federal Relations, Planning & Budgeting, and Research.

State Funding for Higher Education Increased in 30 States from FY12 to FY13

Posted on

annual compilation of data on state funding for higher education shows that 30 states increased their appropriations for higher ed institutions and financial aid from FY12 to FY13. On Tuesday, the
researchers at Illinois State University and the State Higher Education Executive Officers released their tables summarizing initial allocations and estimates reported by states from September 2012 through January 14, 2013. As most states are in the midst of FY13, their budgets for the year are more-or-less finalized; however, some changes could occur due to reporting lag time.

Overall, states are spending just 0.4 percent less on higher education in FY13, compared with FY12鈥攁 relatively small decline given that state support for colleges dropped 7.5 percent from FY11 to FY12. The net decrease in this year’s budgets resulted from cuts in just 16 states, with the worst appearing in Florida (8 percent), Alabama (6 percent) and New Jersey (5.5 percent). Another 16 states, including Washington, are showing increases of less than 2 percent, which notes 鈥渨ill likely amount to a cut once inflation takes its bite.鈥� Budgets in the other 18 states indicate more sizable increases, all the way up to 14 percent in Wyoming.

Generally, however, the gains that some universities are receiving this year do little to make up for massive cuts since the recession. States are still collectively spending 10.8 percent less than they were five years ago, when the recession began, and thirty-eight states have decreased their overall higher ed appropriations during that time, according to a Grapevine . Among those 38, Arizona and New Hampshire cut their budgets by 37 percent and 36 percent respectively and a dozen states, including Washington, sliced funding by over 20 percent.

A news release accompanying the survey data, cited by , states, “Barring a further downturn in the economy, the relatively small overall change … suggests that higher education may be at the beginning stages of a climb out of the fiscal trough caused by the last recession.” However, even if state appropriations continue to stabilize, the Moody鈥檚 report discussed in our points out that federal spending, tuition revenue, endowment returns, and other traditional revenue sources for colleges and universities face major challenges in the coming year. We aren鈥檛 out of the woods yet.

Moody’s Gives Higher Education a Negative Outlook

Posted on

Last week, issued a negative short-term outlook for the entire sector of higher education based on its conclusion that every traditional revenue source for even the most elite colleges and universities is under pressure. That pressure, according to the report, is the result of nation-wide economic, technological and public opinion shifts, which are largely beyond institutions鈥� control.

The outlook report, released annually, articulates the fundamental credit conditions that Moody鈥檚 expects higher education will face during the next 12 to 18 months. For the last two years, Moody鈥檚 gave elite colleges and research universities a stable forecast; but this year, the following factors contributed to a negative outlook for the entire industry:

Struggling Revenue Sources:

  • State appropriations are unlikely to increase meaningfully due to weak economic recovery.
  • Federal spending on research and student aid could be truncated in response to the nation鈥檚 fiscal concerns.
  • Tuition revenue continues to be suppressed by low family incomes and public/political pressure to keep prices down.
  • Endowment returns are vulnerable to any economic volatility that could stem from federal tax and budget decisions.
  • Donations are not expected to increase and could face pressure as Congress evaluates associated tax deductions.
  • Financial diversity is no longer helpful as all revenue streams are strained.

Additional Challenges:

  • Student debt and loan default rates have increased and thus challenged the perceived value of a degree.
  • High school graduates are declining in number.
  • Public and political scrutiny of efficiency and degree value could add to institutions鈥� list of regulatory requirements.
  • New technologies such as online learning and MOOCs could provide new revenue opportunities, but could also undermine traditional higher ed models.

Moody’s analysts warn that revenue streams will never rebound to post-2008 levels and leaders in higher education will need to adapt by thinking strategically and adjusting their operations.

But not all is gloom and doom.听Although Moody鈥檚 gave higher education a negative outlook, most of the country鈥檚 top colleges and universities still hold the strong credit rankings. The UW, for one, continues to maintain a 鈥攖he highest offered by Moody鈥檚.听Additionally, the report stressed that the intrinsic value of and demand for higher education remains stable.

Senate and Congress Reach Deal to Avert Fiscal Cliff

Posted on

Yesterday, the Senate and House of Representatives approved legislation to avert the fiscal cliff.听The deal postpones the automatic, across-the-board spending cuts鈥攌nown as 鈥渢he sequester鈥濃�攂y two months and increases tax rates only for individuals earning over $400,000 and couples earning over $450,000. The bill also preserves funding for Pell Grants and extends for five years the American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC), which allows students and their parents to claim up to $2,500 a year for tuition and college expenses.

For details, please see the provided by Christy Gullion, Director of Federal Relations, and the articles provided by and

Fiscal Cliff Update

Posted on

Christy Gullion, Director of Federal Relations, recently provided an –the combination of large decreases in federal spending and simultaneous increases in income taxes set to take effect January 1st. For background information, please see the 听put out jointly by the 91探花offices of Federal Relations, Planning & Budgeting, and Research.