img:is([sizes=auto i],[sizes^="auto," i]){contain-intrinsic-size:3000px 1500px} /*# sourceURL=wp-img-auto-sizes-contain-inline-css */

91探花

Skip to content

91探花Ranked #28 in the World for Second Straight Year by Times Higher Education (THE)

The 91探花 maintains its #28 rank for second year in a row in the Times Higher Education (THE) , released Wednesday July 17th. This ranking is commonly used to measure a university鈥檚 global impact.

The 91探花is one of only 11 of our US News top public research university peers to make the top 50 in the reputation ranking. In that group of 11, 91探花is ranked 4th overall, coming in 4th in both research and instruction.

This ranking is based on an opinion survey sent to published scholars around the world. THE asks scholars to name the top 15 universities that come to mind in two categories:听 research and teaching. The ranking score is a count of how many times an institution is named by a respondent as being the best in their field. 听This year, Harvard University was cited most often, therefore their score was set to 100 and the rest of the universities were graded on a curve as a percentage of Harvard鈥檚 100 score.

听In the survey, scholars are asked their opinions based on their specific discipline.听 Scholars with at least 14 years of experience in their field are invited to respond.听 This year, THE received 11,554 responses.

Finally, it is worth noting that the survey data used for the Reputation Ranking serves as one of 11 indicators used to create THE World University Rankings that will be published in the fall.

91探花Ranked 14th Best University in the World by U.S. News & World Report

The 91探花 was ranked the 14th best university in the world by U.S. News & World Report鈥檚 inaugural “,” which was released on Tuesday.

Unlike U.S. News鈥檚 national rankings, which focus on undergraduate admissions data and graduation rates, these new rankings were based on research-heavy factors such global research reputation, number of publications, PhDs awarded, and highly cited papers ().听 This methodological difference helps explains the odd fact that U.S. News ranks the 91探花14th globally, but 48th nationally.

“This is about faculty productivity and prestige … It is meaningful for certain things and not necessarily meaningful for other things. We get that. This is about big muscular research universities doing what research universities claim is their mission,” U.S. News Editor, Brian Kelly, told .

The 2015 Best Global Universities rankings include 500 institutions and 49 countries, and provide breakdowns by region, country, and 21 subject areas. The U.S. dominated the rankings with 16 institutions in the top 20, and 134 institutions on the list overall. 听Germany had the second most institutions on the list, with 42, followed by the United Kingdom, with 38. China, which has received a lot of attention in the higher education world lately, also did well with 27 schools among the top 500.

The 91探花ranks highly on several other global lists:听 15th worldwide by the and 26th by the Times Higher Education .

Kaplan鈥檚 New 鈥淥pen College鈥 May Not Be a Bargain for All Students

On Monday, launched “” which is intended to help adult students earn a Bachelor of Science degree in Professional Studies by offering credit for a combination of competency-based course assessments, experiential learning, and external exams (AP, IB, CLEP, DSSTs, etc.). Open College will include free online courses and mentoring to help prospective students identify and organize prior experience that could qualify for college credit. Once students enroll and have their prior skills assessed for credit, they will pay a subscription fee of $195 per month, an assessment fee of $100 per each of the remaining 35 鈥渃ourse equivalents鈥 needed to earn a degree, and a $371-per-credit fee for a final six-credit capstone course.

According to :

鈥淎 student entering with no credits who pursued the program for 48 straight months could earn a bachelor鈥檚 degree for about $15,000. Students who earned credits based on their prior experience would end up paying less than that. Officials expect that such students would typically enroll with about 60 credits, take 24 to 30 months to complete a degree, and pay about $9,500.鈥

Kaplan鈥檚 administration sees Open College as the newest candidate in the hunt to create a $10,000 bachelor’s degree and as a new, flexible way for adults to advance their career.听 While Open College鈥檚 structure and pricing may work well for some students, a few things should be considered before rushing to enroll in Open College.

First, students at Open College will receive little, if any, financial aid.听 Open College鈥檚 website says it will not participate in federal student aid programs; it also gives no indication that students will be eligible for state financial aid or that it will offer any form of institutional aid. Therefore, although comparisons are difficult and potentially problematic, it鈥檚 worth noting that in 2013-14, resident students at public four-year institutions paid an average of $3,120 in annual net tuition and fees (published tuition and fees less grant and aid scholarship from federal, state or institutional sources).[1] If we assume, as Kaplan did, that a student entering with no credits would take 48 months to earn a degree and that tuition and fees would not increase during those four years, then a resident student who enters a public four-year with no previous credits would pay roughly $12,480 in tuition and fees to earn a four-year degree, compared to a similar student at Open College who would pay $15,000. Of course, this total does not consider the cost of rent or room and board, which can be very expensive; but neither does Open College鈥檚 estimate, even though a student earning a degree through their program would presumably still be spending money to eat and live while earning a degree.

Second, employer doubts about the quality of an online degree may impact graduates鈥 employability. According to the released last fall, only 41 percent of hiring managers believe that online programs are of the same quality as traditional, in-person programs.


[1]

Stanford Announces It Will Divest from Coal Companies

On Tuesday, Stanford鈥檚 Board of Trustees it 鈥渨ill not directly invest in approximately 100 publicly traded companies for which coal extraction is the primary business, and will divest of any current direct holdings in such companies.鈥 Furthermore, Stanford stated it would encourage its external investment managers to avoid investments in such companies.

The decision was made at the recommendation of the university’s Advisory Panel on Investment Responsibility and Licensing (APIRL), which had spent several months analyzing a petition by a student group called Fossil Free Stanford. After conducting an extensive research-based review of the issues, APRIL concluded that sufficient coal alternatives exist and that divestment 鈥減rovides leadership on a critical matter facing our world and is an appropriate application of the university’s investment responsibility policy.鈥

This issue has arisen several times at the UW, which (like Stanford) is a leader in . Stanford鈥檚 decision may set a precedent for other universities, including the UW, that have grappled with this issue.

Higher Education and Career-Ready Graduates: New Surveys Offer Insight into America鈥檚 Opinions

The released Tuesday reveal some of America鈥檚 views on both the future of higher education as well as its role in producing desirable outcomes, particularly career-ready graduates. Under Northeastern University鈥檚 sponsorship, FTI Consulting surveyed 263 hiring managers in July as well as 1,000 adult Americans in August.听 Here are some of their findings:

  • Americans continue to see the value in higher education, but are concerned that the system does not adequately prepare graduates for their careers. Respondents ranked 鈥渓evel of education鈥 as the most important factor in determining a job candidate鈥檚 success; yet, 62 percent said colleges currently do only a fair to poor job of preparing graduates for the workforce. That said, 79 percent believe their own college education prepared them well.
  • Americans are conflicted about who has the greatest responsibility to train recent graduates for the workplace: employers (36 percent), colleges/universities (29 percent) or the graduates themselves (35 percent). When Americans were asked why U.S. companies are struggling to find good job candidates, the most common response was that companies are not investing enough in training new hires. However, 87 percent of Americans assert that higher education must change in order to maintain an internationally competitive workforce.
  • Americans and business leaders value 鈥渟oft鈥 skills, like problem-solving and communication, over 鈥渉ard鈥 industry-specific skills. Most Americans (65 percent) and business leaders (73 percent) believe that, for people on the job market, 鈥渂eing well-rounded with a range of abilities is more important than having industry experience because job-specific skills can be learned at work.鈥
  • Americans and business leaders agree that experiential learning is highly valuable to students鈥 careers. Nearly all Americans (89 percent) and business leaders (74 percent) believe that students are more successful in their careers if they have work experience from a field-related internship or job. Both groups agree the most important step the U.S. can take to better prepare colleges students is to broaden the professional work programs available to them.
  • Although most Americans (67 percent) think colleges should adopt new technologies and interactive teaching methods, they have doubts about MOOCs and online degrees. Less than 30 percent of Americans and business leaders believe MOOCs are of the same quality as in-person courses, and only 37 percent of Americans would consider completing a postsecondary degree solely online. However, about half of all respondents believe MOOCs will transform education in the US and that online degrees will be equally accepted by employers within 5 to 7 years.

My take-away from all this, to summarize,听is:听 Americans and business leaders believe that people on the job market need a college education, some professional work experience, and a well-rounded skill-set and in order to succeed. However, they also believe that colleges, businesses, and the government must play a role in helping students garner those qualifications.

Recent Higher Ed Headlines

Here is a quick look at some recent happenings in the world of higher education:

  • , says a report released today by the Center for American Progress (CAP). The College Scorecard, which President Obama proposed last February, is an online tool to help students compare colleges鈥 costs, completion rates, average student-loan debt, and more.听 The CAP asked focus groups of college-bound high-school students for their opinions on the scorecard鈥檚 design, content, and overall effectiveness. Student responses indicated that they did not understand the scorecard’s purpose; they would like the ability to customize the scorecard according to their interests; they want more information on student-loan debt; and they would prefer seeing four-year graduation rates, rather than six-year rates. The CAP report includes recommendations for improving the readability and usability of not just the scorecard, but of government disclosures in general.
  • 听on Friday by a 245 to 139 vote. The bill would eliminate the 鈥渄iversity visa program,鈥 which currently distributes 55,000 visas per year to people from countries with low rates of immigration to the U.S.听 Those visas would instead go to foreign graduates from U.S. universities who earn advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering or mathematics (STEM). Proponents of the Republican-backed bill say it would keep 鈥渉ighly trained, in-demand鈥 workers in the U.S., boosting the nation鈥檚 economy and preserving its global competitiveness. While the White House and most Democrats support the expansion of STEM visas, they oppose the bill鈥檚 attempt to eliminate the diversity visa program. Consequently, the measure is unlikely to pass the Democrat-controlled Senate.
  • , says Inside Higher Ed. The three governors agree on cost-cutting strategies such as requiring some colleges to offer $10,000 bachelor鈥檚 degrees; limiting tuition increases at flagship institutions; linking institutions鈥 graduation rates to state appropriations; and letting performance indicators, such as student evaluations, determine faculty salaries.听 Although the governors鈥 proposed reforms appeal to some voters, 鈥渁ctions taken by all three have been sharply criticized not only by faculty members and higher education leaders in their states, but also by national leaders, who view the erosion of state funding and increased restrictions on what institutions can do a breach of the traditional relationship between state lawmakers and public colleges and universities.鈥

Results of Higher Ed Ballot Initiatives Across the Country

On Tuesday, 11 states voted on ballot measures that could impact higher education. The following table (based on one from ) summarizes how those measures fared.

YES–the measure passed听听听 听听听听听听 NOthe measure failed

Vote Measure Description
CALIFORNIA
YES Prop 30 Would temporarily increase sales and income taxes in order to raise approx. $6 billion in revenue and stave off $963 million worth of cuts to public colleges.
MAINE
NO Question 2 Would allow an $11.3 million bond issue to fund capital for a diagnostic facility at the University of Maine.
MARYLAND
YES Question 4 Would let children of illegal immigrants pay in-state tuition rates provided they meet certain conditions.
MICHIGAN
NO Proposal 2 Would let graduate students form unions and bargain collectively.
MISSOURI
NO Prop B Would raise cigarette taxes and use the revenue to create a Health and Education Trust Fund. About 30 percent of revenue would go to higher education.
MONTANA
YES LR-121 Would require proof of citizenship for a person to receive certain state services, including attending Montana’s public colleges.
NEW JERSEY
YES Question 1 Would let the state issue a $750 million bond for buildings and upgrades at public and private colleges.
NEW MEXICO
YES Question C Would authorize a $120 million sale for certain higher education repairs and improvements.
OKLAHOMA
YES Question 759 Would ban affirmative action programs in the state, including their use in public colleges’ admissions policies.
RHODE ISLAND
YES Question 759 Would give Rhode Island College up to $50 million for its health and nursing program facilities.
WASHINGTON
NO SJR 8223 Would allow 91探花and WSU to invest publicly generated revenue (parking fees, indirect cost reimbursement) in corporate stock.
YES Initiative 1185 Would renew the requirement of a two-thirds legislative vote to create or raise taxes, making new revenue generation more difficult for programs including higher education.

California’s Prop 30 Loses Ground in the Polls

Last week, a Los Angeles Times/USC poll found that . Only 46 percent of registered voters now approve the California ballot initiative designed to deflect almost $1-billion in state higher-education cuts鈥攁 9-point drop over last month鈥檚 poll by the same organizations. Meanwhile, 42 percent of respondents oppose the proposition.

If Prop 30 passes:

  • The state鈥檚 sales tax would increase by 0.25 percent through 2016;
  • Californians earning more than $250,000 would pay higher income taxes through 2018;
  • The resulting $6 to 8.5 billion in additional revenue generated each year would allow the state to continue its current level of higher education funding into, at least, the coming year; and
  • The University of California system would freeze undergraduate tuition rates.

If Prop 30 fails:

  • California community colleges would lose $338 million;
  • The California State system would lose $250 million鈥攔equiring the system to lay off (by their estimate) 1,500 faculty and staff, reduce next year鈥檚 Fall enrollment by about 20,000 students, and increase tuition and fees for in-state students by 5 percent; and
  • The University of California system would lose $375 million鈥攔esulting in, as System officials declared, a tuition increase of as much as 20 percent.

Proponents of Prop 30 face resistance from the state’s fiscal conservatives and competition from another ballot initiative, Proposition 38, which would raise income taxes through 2024 and direct most of the $10 billion per year in revenue toward K-12. If both bills pass, California鈥檚 constitution requires that the proposition with the most votes cancel out the other. This is because Prop 30 and Prop 38 both increase personal income tax rates and could, therefore, be seen as conflicting. However, Prop 38 appears to have , relative to Prop 30 and it is unlikely that both bills will pass.

Another Report on the Effect of Public Investment on Attainment

, a research and advocacy organization, recently published a report entitled 鈥鈥 discussing the effects of higher tuition and lower state investment on a growing and diverse college population. The report focuses on the Millennial generation, the group of students born in the 1980s and 90s and beginning to enter college in the 2000s.

听There were 26.7 million young people (ages 18-24) in the US in 1990, and 30.7 million in 2010. This population growth combined with increased participation in higher education created a 37.9 percent undergraduate enrollment increase in public universities over 20 years. Additionally, the Millennial generation is characterized by much greater racial ethnic and racial diversity than previous generations (12.3 percent are African American, 57.2 percent are white, and 20.1 percent are Hispanic). Both the growth and diversity of the young adult population has altered the needs of students, and institutions have had to adjust both services and support as a result.

These changes in the number, type and needs of students over the last 20 years has been accompanied by a steady disinvestment of state governments in higher education, which resulted in significant 听tuition increases. The very institutions, public, that have absorbed the majority (65.5%) of enrollment increases have also endured the largest decline in funding per student (26.1% decline in real terms from 1990-2010). As a result, public four-year institutions raised tuition by 112.5 percent, adjusted for inflation, over the same time period while the real median household income rose just 2.1 percent.

While states and institutions have often offset these tuition increases with larger financial aid packages for student with need, it is increasingly not enough to cover students鈥 educational expenses, and students borrowed 4.5 times more in 2010 than in 2000.

The report concluded with a number of recommendations:

  • Recognizing that lower investment in higher education results in higher tuition and lower access for low and middle-income students, states should appropriate more money to higher ed, especially investing more in large institutions that produce a significant number of degrees.
  • Reform the tax system to relieve the tax burden on low and middle-income families.
  • States should move away from merit-based aid and focus on need-based financial assistance. They should also increase awareness about the benefits of federal student loan programs to decrease the volume of private debt students take on.

To read the entire report, please click

Faculty Salaries Remain Flat

AAUP released its annual academic salary information this week. The , once again, that faculty salaries have not kept up with inflation, that they have not increased significantly over many years, and that the pay gap between professors at public and private institutions continues to grow.

Although these data do not address the rapidly increasing costs of benefits (healthcare especially), they do make clear that the growing cost of tuition is not primarily driven by increasing faculty salaries, a popular argument. Don’t expect that explanation to fall out of favor, however, as previous years of data have seemed to make no impact on its prevalence.